How to Start a Sportsbook

You start by choosing the jurisdiction and licensing path that matches your target market, business model, and compliance budget before you buy software or launch operations.

Licensing determines what you can sell, where, how you can market it, which payment processors will approve your account, and how much tax you owe on every dollar of GGR. Getting this wrong means rebuilding your product structure later, or facing enforcement.

Three decision scenarios to map before anything else:

• Targeting one US state: Budget for a state-issued licence, mandatory retail presence in some states, geofencing, and a league-authorised data feed agreement. Software must pass state technical certification, which alone adds months.

• Launching a regulated EU or international brand: MGA gives the strongest payment and advertising access. Expect a 4–6 month approval window and ongoing AML/responsible gambling reporting. Your software provider must also be MGA-certified or equivalent.

• Offshore-first or emerging market focus: Curaçao under the LOK regime takes 3–6 months, not weeks, and payment processor dropoffs, ad platform bans, and domain seizure risk are real operating costs on top of the fees. Enforcement tightened through 2025 and 2026, but not uniformly. Brazil now blocks domains through ANATEL and can freeze operator funds held at payment institutions, while Germany's courts removed the legal basis for ISP-level blocking. For Tier-2 or Tier-3 entries, Brazil's federal framework, Canada, and Sub-Saharan Africa each offer accessible entry, and each brings its own compliance and payment complexity to scope before committing.

Technical due diligence before signing any licence application:

• Confirm your software vendor holds certification in your target jurisdiction; some regulators require platform approval before a licence is issued

• Map which KYC, payment, and data feed integrations are pre-approved; non-approved vendors require separate submissions

• Verify feed-integrity and settlement logic certification requirements for your sportsbook

• Check source-of-funds and beneficial-ownership disclosure requirements early; incomplete corporate structures are the most common cause of licence delays

Your licence also defines whether you operate online, retail, or hybrid, each carrying a different build cost and staffing model. Choose the jurisdiction first; then scope your product.

Where enforcement actually bites: six markets in 2025 and 2026

Enforcement diverged sharply across these two years. One regulator gained powers over the money layer, another lost powers over the network layer in court, and several still work through fines and advertising bans alone. Model each market on what its regulator can actually do today.

Netherlands

The KSA has no statutory blocking order of the Brazilian kind. Its enforcement runs through fines on operators and affiliates, removal of unlicensed apps from Google Play and the App Store, takedowns of .nl domains, and pressure on paid search. Payment providers are reached another way: the KSA treats processing payments for unlicensed sites as promoting illegal gambling, can follow up with a binding instruction, and shares a blocking list with providers under a covenant. A dedicated payment-blocking power is part of the government's planned amendment to the Remote Gambling Act, not current law.

Germany

The trend here runs the other way. On 19 March 2025 the Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG, case 8 C 3.24) confirmed that the 2021 State Treaty on Gambling gives the GGL no legal basis for ordering internet access providers to block gambling sites. The GGL had already dropped ISP blocking after adverse rulings in 2022 and now works through host providers instead. Advertising is the sharper instrument: promoting an unlicensed offer to German players is prohibited, which is what puts affiliates and networks at risk.

Brazil

Brazil built the financial enforcement layer other regulators are still asking for, and it points at unlicensed operators rather than licensed ones. Domain blocking runs through ANATEL on lists supplied by the SPA, and had reached more than 25,000 domains by January 2026, according to the Ministry of Finance. On the money side, Decreto 13.033/2026, article 7, gives banks and payment institutions 24 hours from an SPA notice to block the operator's accounts and stop new transactions, and 48 hours to confirm compliance to the SPA. Portaria SPA/MF 2.750/2026, in force since 14 September 2026, applies the same 24-hour block. Under Lei Complementar 224/2025, an institution that keeps processing those payments after formal notice becomes jointly liable for the taxes owed. Hold a Brazilian authorisation and none of this is your compliance timeline. Operate without one and it is how you lose the market.

Sweden

Sweden works through a promotion ban, not a whitelist. Under the Gambling Act (2018:1138) only licensed operators may be marketed to Swedish consumers, which makes affiliates and influencers the pressure point, and Spelinspektionen has named influencer channels a supervision priority. Extending the ban to payment and administrative services is a proposal aimed at 2027, not current law.

Ontario

Ontario splits the two functions and it is easy to get wrong. iGaming Ontario is the commercial counterparty operators contract with; enforcement sits entirely with the AGCO. The Registrar's Standards for Internet Gaming require registrants to cease unregulated Ontario activity and hold operators responsible for the third parties they contract with, affiliates included. In May 2025 the AGCO advised media platforms to pull advertising for unlicensed offshore brands, and BetMGM Canada paid CAD 110,000 over non-compliant affiliate inducements.

United Kingdom

Under LCCP social responsibility code 3.4.4, financial vulnerability checks apply at £150 of net deposits in a rolling 30-day period, in force since 28 February 2025 after an opening threshold of £500 from 30 August 2024. They run in the background on public data: county court judgments, individual voluntary arrangements, debt management plans, bankruptcies. A failed check triggers customer-level action, not a licence event, and no further check is needed if one was completed in the past 12 months. Deeper financial risk assessments at higher thresholds remain in pilot.

Before choosing a jurisdiction, model the enforcement timeline alongside the licensing cost.

Define the sportsbook business model, target market, and operating scope

A sportsbook business plan starts with choosing the launch model, target market, and operating scope, because those choices determine licensing, product design, and acquisition costs.

Online-only is the default starting point for most new operators. Upfront costs are lower (a white-label setup runs $10,000–$50,000 versus $150,000–$600,000+ for a custom build) and time to market is 4–8 weeks versus 6–18 months. There is no physical infrastructure, which means you can scale across jurisdictions without rebuilding the operation from scratch.

Retail ties you to a specific geography. You need premises, local staff, and a jurisdiction-specific licence that may take 1–12 months to obtain. Fixed costs are higher, iteration is slower, and expansion requires repeating the process in each new location.

Hybrid offers the widest market coverage but carries full operational complexity from day one. It is realistic only after the online layer is stable and generating consistent GGR.

Beyond the delivery model, the plan must define:

• Geography and audience: local single-market vs. multi-jurisdiction; language and currency requirements follow directly from this

• Sports and event coverage: broad generalist book or niche focus (esports, regional leagues)

• Margin strategy: standard hold of 4–5% on spreads, or higher-margin parlay products generating 15–30%

• Acquisition model: affiliate-driven, paid media, or organic. Tier-1 cost per depositor is commonly modelled at $300–$600. Whatever number you use, it has to be recoverable inside your margin structure

Define launch scope precisely. Scope built on ambition miscalibrates licensing spend, product priorities, and working capital from the start.

Technology decisions to validate before vendor sign-off

AI-driven trading has moved from differentiator to baseline requirement. Real-time odds adjustment, sharp-bettor exposure flagging, and session-based promotion delivery all depend on clean API access to the trading engine. A white-label that locks those hooks behind proprietary tooling will force expensive retrofitting the moment you want to move lines independently.

Live betting backend architecture is the harder constraint. Low-latency feeds and sub-second odds updates are table stakes; what separates stable operators is a concurrency model that handles simultaneous market suspensions without settlement errors. Validate this at vendor-selection with a load-test scenario.

Esports and bet-and-watch add incremental GGR with lower odds-management complexity, a logical second-phase expansion once core sports are operationally stable. Prioritise vendors whose architecture supports these verticals through modular add-ons rather than full platform rebuilds.

Responsible gambling compliance framework

Responsible gambling is a regulatory obligation with direct audit consequences. Under the UK LCCP, age verification comes before any gambling activity (social responsibility code 3.2.11), self-exclusion must be applied as soon as practicable with the customer removed from marketing databases within two days (code 3.5.3), and financial vulnerability checks apply at £150 of net deposits in a rolling 30-day period (code 3.4.4). MGA rules mandate equivalent controls plus documented intervention procedures when player behaviour signals harm. Auditors specifically test whether bonus communications reach self-excluded players, a common violation, and whether celebrity or influencer promotions carry age-restriction disclosures. Operationally, your platform must support deposit limits, session time reminders, reality checks, and self-exclusion tools that are easy to reach from any screen. Configure your CRM to suppress all promotional messaging for excluded players at the API level, not just through manual list management. Document every RG interaction log. Auditors ask for evidence that the process ran.

Select the sportsbook software stack for trading, front end, and settlement

You need software that can take bets, manage markets, route pricing and risk decisions, settle wagers, and connect to payments, data feeds, and reporting.

Think of the stack in four layers, and evaluate each before committing to a vendor or a build path:

Turnkey sportsbook software compresses this into one vendor contract: launch in 4–8 weeks, pay $10,000–$50,000 upfront, and accept a 15–35% revenue share. Custom development gives full control but costs $150,000–$600,000+ over 6–18 months. Before signing either path, confirm that SGP (hold 15–30%), in-play cash-out, and crypto wallet support are production-ready; these drive the bulk of GGR and are non-negotiable for a competitive product.

Before signing, evaluate:

• Regulatory certifications: does the vendor hold approval in your target jurisdiction?

• API openness: can you plug in your own KYC, payments, and odds feeds, or are you locked into the ecosystem?

• SLA and uptime history: request 12 months of documented data; settlement failures during peak events are a liability

• Revenue share breakeven: divide the annual flat fee by the revenue share rate. On a 20% share against a $400,000 annual flat licence, the flat fee wins above roughly $170,000 of monthly GGR. Run the arithmetic on your own two quotes

• Exit and data portability: understand migration costs before you are mid-volume and dependent

Use sports data feeds and odds providers without giving up your edge

Choose a data provider based on coverage, latency, uptime, support, integration fit, and whether the pricing model still lets your sportsbook keep an edge.

Most operators face a straightforward trade-off: fully managed pricing (the provider sets and updates odds automatically) gets you live faster, but you cede control over margins. A hybrid setup lets your traders adjust lines, especially useful for local football markets or proprietary same-game markets where in-house knowledge creates a genuine pricing advantage over generic feeds.

When a feed fails mid-event, your trading workflow must either suspend affected markets automatically or switch to a backup. Operators without a redundancy plan routinely settle bets incorrectly, a compliance and liability risk on top of the revenue hit. Build that failover path before go-live.

Build a modern sportsbook risk management stack and trading workflow

Risk management is the live process of controlling exposure, adjusting lines, setting limits, and protecting margin. For a startup bookmaker, the goal isn't a full trading room on day one; it's a documented set of rules that prevent a single bad outcome from threatening liquidity.

Core tool categories every sportsbook should run from launch:

• Liability dashboards: real-time visibility of net exposure per market, sport, and event

• Automated bet limits: per-player and per-market caps triggered without manual input

• Sharp-player detection: flags accounts betting into stale odds or consistently ahead of line moves

• Fraud and bonus-abuse checks: pattern matching across IP, device fingerprint, and withdrawal velocity

• Integrity monitoring: alerts tied to suspicious betting patterns that may indicate match manipulation

Key roles for a small operation:

Limit and exposure policy: set these before go-live:

• Define maximum single-bet liability per sport and per event tier (e.g., Tier-1 football vs. lower-league fixtures)

• Set automated market suspension triggers: if net liability on one outcome exceeds X% of weekly GGR target, suspend and escalate

• Establish a sharp-bettor response protocol: reduced limits, manual review, or closure, documented and applied consistently to withstand regulatory scrutiny

• Cap same-game parlay liability separately from straight-bet exposure; SGP correlation risk compounds quickly

Outsourced trading covers line-setting and exposure management at lower CAPEX than building in-house. Viable for launch if in-house odds competency is limited, but define clearly which decisions remain with your team and which are delegated.

KPIs to track weekly: hold percentage by sport, event-level volatility, and concentration risk, the share of liability sitting on a single outcome.

Set up banking, payments, and payouts that can pass compliance review

The first practical blocker is merchant account approval. Banks classify iGaming operators as high-risk, which limits processor options and raises fees. A Curaçao-licensed operator typically pays 2–5% on fiat deposit volume. Do not model this against handle: in sports betting the same money is staked repeatedly, so at a 5% hold one dollar of net deposit can generate up to twenty dollars of handle before it is exhausted. Reserves of 5–10% of processed volume are standard. To pass underwriting, processors want to see your gambling licence, jurisdiction approval, AML policy, RG tools, and 3–6 months of projected financials.

Payment stack architecture: decisions to make at build time:

• Primary PSP plus backup: Never launch with a single processor; if your primary PSP suspends your account, you need a live fallback within hours, not weeks

• 3DS2 configuration: Reduces chargebacks but adds friction; tune exemption thresholds by market and deposit size

• Decline recovery logic: 15–25% of card declines are soft declines recoverable by retry; build this into the deposit flow from day one

• Crypto rails: Add alongside fiat to reach the 20–25% of bettors who prefer non-bank settlement and to reduce chargeback exposure on that segment

• Reserve management: model the rolling reserve as working capital. At $1,000,000 of monthly deposit volume, a 5–10% reserve ties up $50,000–$100,000 at the processor. Reserve is calculated on processed volume, never on handle

KYC and AML integration:

KYC costs run $1.50–$5.00 per verified user. Automate document verification and liveness checks from day one, because manual review queues above 24 hours breach regulatory SLAs in most jurisdictions. Build source-of-funds triggers at the thresholds your own regulator sets rather than at a borrowed number. In the UK, for example, the £150 net deposit figure drives financial vulnerability checks, which is a different test from source of funds. Suspicious activity reports must be filed within regulatory deadlines, and missed filings are the most common compliance breach at small operators.

Estimate the full startup cost, including build, compliance, operations, and runway

The cost depends on jurisdiction, software, licensing, payments, staffing, marketing, and whether you are launching online, retail, or hybrid. Compliance, data feeds, and customer acquisition routinely dwarf the initial build budget over a 12–24 month runway.

Two unit-economics ratios decide break-even faster than any line item:

First, hold percentage: a standard -110/-110 market carries a 4.76% overround, 52.38% implied probability per side and 104.76% together, which converts to a 4.55% theoretical hold on handle when the book is balanced. The two are used interchangeably and they are not the same thing, which is why margin projections built on 4.76% come in high. Same-game parlays hold materially more, so product mix moves the P&L faster than any single cost line. Second, CAC versus LTV: at $300–$600 per depositor in Tier-1 markets, you need strong retention and cross-sell to justify acquisition spend at scale.

Bonus costs compress margin in months one through six. Bonus abuse and matched-betting arbitrage can turn a positive hold into a net loss on promoted events. Cap welcome offers by bet type and enforce turnover requirements from launch day.

Launch the sportsbook in a controlled 30/60/90-day sequence

Treat launch as a structured release process. A phased 30/60/90-day sequencing reduces the risk of a critical failure affecting all players simultaneously and gives you clean data for each operational layer before the next one activates.

Days 1–30: Internal validation and soft launch

• Complete end-to-end testing across all bet types: pre-match, in-play, parlays, and same-game combinations

• Trigger test results and verify settlement accuracy, void handling, and wallet credit/debit flows

• Run full KYC journeys including edge cases: document resubmission, rejected IDs, source-of-funds triggers

• Load-test to simulate peak-event traffic; identify bottlenecks in odds delivery and settlement queues

• Soft launch to a limited user group (invite-only or geo-restricted); real money, active monitoring, rollback procedures assigned to named team members

Days 31–60: Controlled growth and operational calibration

• Open registration to target market; cap daily new accounts if support and KYC queue capacity is not yet scaled

• Run first live events under active trading supervision; review hold percentage and liability concentration daily

• Validate payment processing end-to-end: deposit approval rates, withdrawal SLA compliance, chargeback ratio

• Audit affiliate partner creatives and bonus terms for compliance before scaling spend

• Identify top friction points in onboarding funnel (drop-off by step) and fix before volume increases

Days 61–90: Scale and optimise

• Expand sport and market coverage based on actual bettor demand data

• Activate retention campaigns: lifecycle messaging, loyalty tier introduction, personalised market push notifications

• Review weekly GGR by sport, hold by market type, and CAC vs. depositor LTV; adjust product mix and acquisition spend accordingly

• Conduct first internal compliance audit: AML file completeness, RG case log, regulator reporting deadlines

• Define the trigger conditions (GGR threshold, player volume) that justify migrating from white-label revenue share to a flat-fee or custom platform

Keep rollback procedures documented and assigned to specific team members so any critical failure (settlement error, payment outage, regulatory breach) can be reversed or contained within minutes, not hours.

Plan compliant acquisition, bonuses, and retention for the first growth phase

Every campaign you run, whether paid social, affiliate deals, SEO, or sponsorships, must pass the same compliance filter applied to your licence and product.

Compliant acquisition channels and what each requires:

• SEO and content: no prohibited claims, no misleading odds comparisons, age-restriction notices on every landing page

• Affiliates: audit each partner's site for youth-oriented content, require compliance with the advertising codes in your target jurisdiction, and confirm that bonus terms in their copy match your T&Cs exactly. Affiliate traffic is a primary acquisition channel for most operators, which makes vetting non-negotiable

• Paid social and display: geo-target strictly to licensed territories, block audiences under the minimum legal age, avoid urgency language that implies guaranteed winnings

• Sponsorships: review sport, league, and venue audience demographics before signing; some jurisdictions restrict gambling sponsorships near youth events

• Referral programmes: structure incentives around verified depositors only, not registrations, to stay within bonus-abuse and AML thresholds

Bonus policy: rules that protect your margin and your licence:

• State wagering requirements, expiry dates, and eligible markets in plain language before the player opts in

• Cap welcome offers at levels proportional to average first deposit to avoid attracting bonus abusers

• Restrict welcome bonuses to straight bets or low-hold market types; allowing SGP staking on welcome offers inflates cost-per-redeemed-bonus by 3–5x

• Build self-exclusion checks into every promotional trigger so excluded players never receive bonus communications

• Set turnover requirements from day one: retroactive tightening after the first costly quarter damages player trust and generates disputes

Retention mechanics that generate LTV without regulatory risk:

Loyalty tiers and VIP handling create long-term value without aggressive promotional claims. Lifecycle messaging (reactivation, event-based push notifications, personalised market suggestions) converts more than generic offers when it stays within opt-in consent rules.

Reality checks and deposit-limit prompts embedded in the UX signal responsible operation to regulators and reduce chargeback risk. A bookmaker that builds compliant marketing from day one avoids regulatory warnings that freeze acquisition budgets at exactly the moment growth is needed most.

Set up the day-to-day operating model, staffing, and support workflows

After launch, the sportsbook runs through staffing, trading, support, compliance, settlement, and reporting workflows that keep the business controlled and profitable.

Core team for a startup sportsbook: minimum viable staffing:

24/7 support coverage is the regulatory baseline in most jurisdictions. Model shift costs before launch.

Daily and weekly operating routines:

• Pre-event: Trading lead reviews market depth, sets per-event liability caps, confirms data feed status

• In-play: Monitor live tick updates, flag arbitrage patterns, escalate large bets for manual review

• Post-event: Settlement batch runs within agreed SLA windows; support queue clears disputes within 24 hours

• Weekly: BI report on GGR by sport, hold percentage by market, and cost-per-active-player. These numbers drive the next week's trading and promotional decisions

Minimal toolset to keep operations functional:

• CRM for player segmentation and bonus tracking

• Helpdesk (ticketing) for support queues

• BI dashboard connected to the sportsbook platform's back office

• Compliance tracker for AML and RG case logging

When to add headcount: The trigger for a second trading analyst is typically $500,000+ monthly GGR or 10+ concurrent live events during peak hours. For compliance, a full-time officer is warranted once monthly active players exceed 2,000 or when your regulator mandates documented compliance-function independence.

Manage post-launch risk, fraud, and ongoing compliance

The operating risk layer activates the moment the first bet settles, and it runs continuously, driven by data that changes daily, bettors who probe every edge, and regulators who update their expectations without warning.

KYC and AML monitoring do not end at registration. A compliant sportsbook re-screens accounts when deposit velocity changes, flags transactions above jurisdiction thresholds, and files suspicious activity reports on schedule. The UK's £150 net deposit trigger for financial vulnerability checks shows how granular these obligations have become. A gap between your monitoring logic and the current ruleset becomes a regulatory finding, not a warning.

Fraud and bonus abuse stay constant through the life of the book. Common vectors:

• Multi-accounting to exploit welcome offers

• Arbitrage betting coordinated across accounts to guarantee profit regardless of outcome

• Matched-betting rings that drain promotional budgets without generating real GGR

Detection requires rule-based triggers combined with behavioural analytics: velocity checks, device fingerprinting, IP clustering, and deviation from a player's baseline betting pattern.

Trading-side risk demands the same continuous attention. Sharp line movement on obscure markets, or correlated bets across related events, can indicate either a sharp bettor or an integrity issue. Both require a structured response workflow, documented escalation paths, not ad-hoc judgment.

Responsible gambling obligations sit in the compliance function. Regulators increasingly require documented evidence that RG triggers are firing correctly, that self-excluded players receive zero promotional contact, and that affordability checks are conducted at defined thresholds.

The realistic operational posture: daily review of KYC queues, AML alerts, fraud flags, and RG triggers as standing workflows. Rules, thresholds, and regulatory guidance change; your monitoring stack must change with them.

Frequently asked questions

How much does it cost to start a sportsbook?

A white-label sportsbook costs $10,000 to $50,000 upfront. A custom-built platform costs $150,000 to $600,000 or more. Licensing, data feeds, payment processing and player acquisition sit outside that figure and usually exceed the build over the first 12 to 24 months.

How long does it take to launch a sportsbook?

Four to eight weeks on a white-label platform, six to eighteen months on a custom build. Licensing runs in parallel and often sets the real date: Curaçao takes 3 to 6 months, Malta 4 to 6 months, and a US state licence 6 to 18 months.

Which licence should a new sportsbook choose?

The licence that covers the markets you intend to sell in. Malta opens regulated European access at the highest compliance load, with gaming tax charged only on Malta-player revenue. Curaçao is faster and cheaper to enter but carries high-risk banking treatment. A US state licence is valid in that state alone.

Do I need my own licence to run a white-label sportsbook?

Usually no. Under most white-label agreements you operate under the provider's licence. That removes the application fee, and it also means the licence is not yours: you cannot migrate it, sell it, or keep it when the relationship ends.

What hold percentage should a sportsbook expect?

A balanced -110/-110 market returns a 4.55% theoretical hold on handle, from a 4.76% overround. Same-game parlays hold materially more. Actual hold depends on product mix, bonus spend, and how much sharp action your risk layer absorbs.

What do payment processing and reserves actually cost?

Expect 2% to 5% on deposit volume, plus a rolling reserve of 5% to 10% of processed volume held by the processor. Both are calculated on money moving through the payment stack, not on handle, which is several times larger.

What delays a sportsbook licence application?

Incomplete corporate structures and unresolved beneficial-ownership disclosure are the most common causes. Source-of-funds evidence, uncertified platform software, and integrations with vendors the regulator has not pre-approved each add further rounds of questions.

Can I take bets from any country once I hold a licence?

No. A licence authorises the markets its regulator names and nothing else. Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden, Brazil, Ontario and the UK each require their own local authorisation, and each enforces against operators serving their residents without one.

Sources

Regulatory figures on this page were verified against the following primary sources on 16 September 2026, and the legal references were rechecked on 24 September 2026. Fees and tax rates change, so check the instrument before you budget against it.

• Grand View Research, Sports Betting Market Size, Share and Trends Analysis Report, 2025 to 2030 forecast.

• Curaçao: National Ordinance on Games of Chance (LOK), in force 24 December 2024, article 5.19 on the licence and supervisory fees. Curaçao Gaming Authority, License Fees under the LOK, version 2.0 of 15 October 2025. Profit Tax Ordinance 1940 on the 15% and 22% rates.

• Malta: Gaming Act (Cap. 583). Gaming Licence Fees Regulations (S.L. 583.03) on the application fee, annual fee and compliance contribution. Legal Notice 84 of 2026 on the gaming tax rates in force from 1 October 2026.

• Isle of Man: Online Gambling Regulation Act 2001. Online Gambling (Licence Fees) Regulations 2023 (SD 2023/0148). Gambling Duty Act 2012.

• Gibraltar: Gambling Act 2025, in force 1 April 2026. Gambling (Duties and Licence Fees) Regulations 2026 (LN.2026/065) on licence fees and duty.

• Brazil: Lei 14.790/2023. Portaria SPA/MF 827/2024 on authorisation conditions, the R$30 million fee, the 20% Brazilian shareholding and the 150-day review period. Lei Complementar 224/2025 on the GGR rate and the joint tax liability of payment institutions. Decreto 13.033/2026, article 7, on the 24-hour block and the 48-hour confirmation, and Portaria SPA/MF 2.750/2026 on blocking the accounts of unauthorised operators. Ministério da Fazenda, news release of January 2026 on more than 25,000 blocked sites.

• Germany: Glücksspielstaatsvertrag 2021 (GlüStV 2021). Bundesverwaltungsgericht, judgment of 19 March 2025, case 8 C 3.24, on blocking orders against internet access providers.

• Sweden: Gambling Act (2018:1138) and Spelinspektionen supervisory reporting.

• Ontario: Gaming Control Act, 1992. iGaming Ontario Act, 2024. AGCO Registrar's Standards for Internet Gaming. AGCO Order of Monetary Penalty against BetMGM Canada, 26 March 2025.

• United Kingdom: Gambling Act 2005. Gambling Commission Licence Conditions and Codes of Practice: social responsibility code 3.2.11 on age verification, 3.4.4 on financial vulnerability checks (£500 from 30 August 2024, £150 since 28 February 2025) and 3.5.3 on self-exclusion.

• Netherlands: Betting and Gaming Act (Wet op de kansspelen), as amended by the Remote Gambling Act (Wet kansspelen op afstand). Kansspelautoriteit enforcement reporting and Supervisory Agenda 2026.

• United States: New Jersey Sports Wagering Act (N.J.S.A. 5:12A-10 et seq.) and P.L.2025, c.66 on the 19.75% rate, with the Division of Gaming Enforcement fee schedule. Pennsylvania: 4 Pa.C.S. Chapter 13C, sections 13C62 and 13C63 on the 36% sports wagering tax, with the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board fee schedule.

Which licence fits the markets you want?

Send us your target markets, your launch date, and who owns the company. We come back with the jurisdictions that actually cover those markets, what each one costs in year one and every year after, and where your payment setup is likely to break. No charge for the review, and no obligation.

A licence your payment providers will accept, and a year-two cost you can see before you sign.

MAP MY JURISDICTION